Assessing Quality of Care in Kinship and Foster Family Care by Jill Assignment

Assessing Quality of Care in Kinship and Foster Family Care by Jill Duerr Berrick (2010) - Assignment ExampleKinship care has gained increasing tutelage from practitioners, policymakers and researchers. The attention has been captivated by the large numbers of children being served in foster care by kinsperson and the scarcity of information available more or less the rapidly growing arrangement for care (Berrick, 1997, p.273). According to Mokgosi (1997, p.7), placement with extended family or kinship is becoming widely used as an alternative placement. some(prenominal) child welfare experts believe that children go forth be better served if their care is provided by family members within the community of origin rather than by strangers. For, separation from out-of-town family members may lead to the childs disruption, if unattended. On the other hand, Berrick claims, on a number of measures relating to the home environment, non-kin homes were rated as more safe (1997, p.273). The author describes kin caregivers as older than foster family parents and a group heavily represented by single women of color who are struggling themselves with limited incomes (Berrick, 1997, p.273). Whilst foster family providers broadly prepare for their new role as parents, kinship foster parents more often fall into older parenthood in response to a jam family emergency. Trends in this data point to the need for further research in the field, that is, the need for changes in policy and practice that might strengthen the kin and non-kin resources before long available to dependent children are also suggested (Berrick, 1997, p.279). Although the study done by Berrick was designed to assess the quality in kin and non-kin homes, focus herein will be given on its quantitative aspect, that is to say, in terms of the empirical patterns found in the data collected, so as to explain the research phenomena with regards to its quantitative data. The primary method used was survey r esearch, which included interviews. The county staff drew a random sample of 123 kinship and 97 non-kin homes from their foster care databases. Herein, a simple random sampling method of analysis was implemented. Sampling is a technical accounting device to rationalize the collection of information, to choose in an arrogate way the restricted set of objects, persons, events from which the actual information will be drawn (Bless and Higson-Smith, 1995, p.85). In this study, the sample was restricted to those homes that included a child in care between 5 to 12 years of age. A letter describing the scope and purpose of the study was sent on all kin and non-kin providers. Providers were offered a $20.00 stipend for their participation. However, only fourteen kin (11%) and 11 non-kin (11%) providers responded to the request.