We Must Have the Right to Choose Euthanasia :: Free Euthanasia Essay

We Must Have the Right to Choose Euthanasia           in that location are many sides to the dilemma of whether or not mercy killing should be carried out.  There is the head word of morality, the question of active versus passive mercy killing and the question of when euthanasia should be put into use.  None of these questions are totally repel and dry.  There seem to be more grayish areas within this smother than there are black and white.    Yet when you look at the line on a personal level with the actual individuals involved, some of those gray areas almost disappear.  People are put on this earth to live.  When it gets to the heading where the quality of a persons disembodied spirit gets so bad that they can no longer function in the world, there is no reason to nip that person to stay alive.  Euthanasia is therefore a  necessary wrong for those whose practical manners is in effect over due to a terminal illness or otherwise life devastating condition.           If a person is in unbear equal pain and close to death or is in a vegetable state and no longer able to function, their life is by all practical means over.  There is no reason to keep them alive.  The simply way to end their physical life is by euthanasia.  The question is whether to do this by way of active euthanasia or passive euthanasia.  Many are against active euthanasia because in this case you actually kill the person rather than letting them die.  barely both methods are used for the same end which is to end someones life without further pain for the patient as well as for the family.  The only choice to make after this fact is established is which of these means remediate carries out the end. James Rachels, a philosophy professor, says that, if one simply withholds discourse in the way of passive euthanasia, it may take the pati ent longer to die, and so he may suffer more than he would if more mold action were taken and a lethal injection given. (Rachels, p.111)  This defeats the purpose of euthanasia which is to end suffering.  Therefore, in cases where euthanasia is going to be carried out, active euthanasia is the better choice.