2012 London Olympic Games Construction Essay

2012 capital of the United Kingdom surpassing Games miscellaneaula EssayMy writing is based on the 2012 surpassing Games hold in capital of the United Kingdom, the selected causeor submitted expand documentation and ensure details which were evaluated erectvassed by the customers. All the documents deal with exclusively type of administrative procedure, procurement strategy among others.The survey also explained all told items involved in the bend industry coming from the thrust history, the pre- winding and post-construction stage. This report go out benefit the client as to the victorious completion of the project receivable to organize administrative procedure of procurement strategy.1.2 devise shortened or HistoryThe capital of the United Kingdom 2012 Olympic Games, the Project Brief was a high level document that go forthlined the objectives and functional requirements for each project. As the project progressed by with(predicate) the opposite purpli sh Institute of British Architects (RIBA) stages of the normal process, the abbreviated was developed to formInitial BriefDesign sketchProject BriefThe initial brief was used to set out the initial ODA requirements of the project and informed the development of the build through RIBA design stages A/B. It captured the data from the Project Initial inventory and the London Organizing citizens committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (LOCOG) Venue Requirements and described what the Design team was required.The design brief define what will be the next phase of the project that should be delivered and informed the RIBA Stages C/D. It focused on the technical requirements and the measurable criteria defined during Design development.The Project BriefThe London 2012 Olympic Games projects argon including 1 to 10 milest unitary base as belowMilestone -01, formulation of the Olympic StadiumMilestone -02, Construction of the Aquatics CentreMilestone -03, Construction of the VelodromeMilestone -04, Construction of the International Broadcast Centre/briny Press Centre(IBC/MPC)Milestone -05, Construction of the Handball and Basketball ArenasMilestone -06, Construction of the lee Valley White Water CentreMilestone -07, Construction study on Eton Manor and the Royal Artillery BarracksMilestone -08, The External body structure of the Olympic VillageMilestone -09, Construction of all Permanent link upMilestone -10, Construction work at Stratford StationIncluding the project motion picture Appendix -BUnder the Project Brief, the side by side(p) are allowdProject fig- 2012 London Olympic gamesProject Value- 9,298m-the Public Sector Funding portion select Period Construction took four years from 2007 to 2011.Project procural method- design and buildAwarded Main Contractor Name-Sir Robert McAlpineBarr ConstructionCarillionISGBalfour BeattyConsultant Name ArchitectPopulousWilkinson Eyre Architects KSS Design GroupHopkins Architects, Grant Associate sZaha Hadid ArchitectsStructural and service engineers, PlanningBuro HappoldExpedition engine roomHyland Edgar DriverOve Arup Partners, BDSPSKMSavilles Hepher DixonProject client IOC, LOCOG, ODA, lee(prenominal) Valley Regional Park sanction,02. Chapter2.1. Identified Various People / OrganisationsLondon 2012 Olympic Games Organizations involved in key Project StakeholdersOlympic spoken language Authority (OAD)The London Organizing Committee of the Olympics Games (LOCOG)The Greater London Authority (GLA)British Olympic Association (BOA)The organization (MPA, 2006).And also in additionalThe city manager of LondonOlympic Park Legacy CompanyLondon phylogeny Agency (LDA)British Paralympic Association (BPA)The Olympic Board (OB)International Olympic Committee (IOC)International Paralympic Committee (IPC).Their main functions are to collectively advice and fork up assurance to the board (MPA, 2006). These stakeholders commence different perceptions as to what constitute success . enchantment they all confound different responsibilities towards the success of the game, their individual objectives has to be met. It is worth noting that their change objectives were well reconciled as per the game. Shared understanding was created among them and rapprochement of objectives was easy because one of the predominant overarching aims of both the UK government and IOC for the games is sustainability among the Consultant, the main Contractor, the Sub-Contractor and the Supplier.The more details including the Appendix-A2.2. Financing building/Final CostThe financing structures are two distinct aspects of the London 2012 Olympic Games, the preparation for the games by the ODA and LOCOG operational compute running the games.The Secretary of state for culture, media and sport announce, in an unwritten Statement to the house, that the reckon for the preparation of the 2012 London Olympics had increased from an initial try budget of 2.375 million, at the time of the bid the estimated embody of the Games was 4 billion 3 billion for the Olympic Park and an element for elite and club sport and 1 billion as classify of the wider Lower grass Valley regeneration (excluding tax and wider security costs).Following a review by the Government a revised funding cost was announced in March 2007 of 9.325billion, as details below dodge-01.The work out as Announced for the Games on 15 March 2007 degreeDescription quantity Million ()1Core Olympic Costs -Olympic Delivery Authority(ODA)3,081.002Infrastructure and regeneration costs associated with the Olympic park and other venues1,673.003 contingency (Excluding Tax)500.004 good ( Net of Tax )(1+2+3)5,254.005 other(a) (Non ODA),Olympic Cost388.00Other ProvisionsPolicing and Wider Security600.00Tax (on ODA Costs)836.00 just general programme Contingency (including tax)2,247.006 quantity Provisions3,683.00Grand Total (4+5+6)9,325.00Overall Revised Budget9,325.00Table -01The 2012 Olympic Games over-a ll budget (9.325 Billion () were distributed to all stockholders and summarized as follows on Table-02.Public Funding obtainableItemDescriptionAmount Billion ()1Exchequer5.9752National Lottery2.1753Greater London Authority0.9254London Development Agency0.250Total Cost(1+2+3+4)9.325Table -02However, on 24 March 2010, the Awarded budget was reduced to 27m and breakdown as follows Table 03ItemDescriptionAmount Million ()1Olympic Delivery Authority(ODA)ODA Base Cost Including VAT6,100.00Programme Contingency968.00Funders Contingency1,004.00Total Available to ODA8,072.002Non-Olympic Delivery Authority(ODA)Elite and Community Sports290.00Paralympic Games66.00 olfaction of London32.00Security600.00Security Contingency238.00Total Non ODA1,226.003Total Public Sector Funding Package (1+2)9,298.00Overall Original Budget9,298.00Table -03The 2012 Olympic Games over-all Revised budget (9.298 Billion () were distributed to all stockholders and summarized as follows on Table-04.Sources of Funding ItemDescriptionAmount Billion ()1National Lottery2.1752London (GLA and LDA)0.8753Central Government6.248Total Cost(1+2+3)9.298Table -04Unveiling the governments last-place quarterly budget update, the sports minister, Hugh Robertson, said that at a conservative estimate the final cost of the Games would be 8.921billion against an overall original budget of 9.298billion2.3. Project Procurement Structure/MethodologyThe specific tonic construction of Olympic stadium, the project lead has been established, and then the procurement method will be accepted. The project was procured on a design and build basis.A method where the contractor is answerable for undertaking both the design and the construction of the work in give back for a lump sum price.There are variants on this extract depending on the degree to which initial design is included in the clients requirements. escort of a contractor is often by two stages tendering, thus belongings a competitive element, but not expecti ng every tenderer to produce full proposals. The clients requirements can range from a simple accommodation schedule to a fully worked out scheme design, but generally should be matched by the contractors proposalFor design and build procurement there are terce main types of contractPackage Deal or Turnkey ContractDesign and Build Contracts Contractors Design ObligationsContractors Design for Specific Elements OnlyThe project procurement plan includes the followingSourcing materials with low embodied carbonMinimizing elope at source, promoting use of secondary materialsPolicies on ecoEcologically sensitive materials e.g look and FoodEthical procurement and fair employmentSourcing healthy materials and ensuring health and resort on site (ODA, 20091)The procurement plan is being implement by a rigorous procurement process. All partners and collaborators will have to cope with individual and overall criteria in order to contribute to the successful outcome of the plan. This wil l have to be made visible through product and service supply, engagement in relevant projects, promotion of behavioral adjustment, consumers, employees and supply chains (ODA, 2009).2.4. Main Forms of Construction Contract/Tender DocumentThe New Engineering Contract (NEC) was used to facilitate all the requirement documents during the bidding and awarding stage. Both parties, the Client and the Contractor, agreed and closed the project based on the NEC contract.The NEC3 suite of contracts was selected because it provided the following key attributes in response to ODA, s Requirements.A flexible approach, providing a range of contract solutions relative to the level of design information available and procurement survival being considered.The pro-active management of risk as an inherent and fundamental element of the entire contract forms.A collaborative approach supporting seasonable delivery, which is fundamental to ODA.Full visibility of cost (Except under option a contracts), supporting effective programme budget management.ODA has number of obligations under the London Olympic Games Act 2006, particularly around risk, brand protection and stakeholder rights, which necessitated changes to the measuring stick NEC3 Contract Forms. These changes included,Additional collateral warranties for key interested partiesRestrictions in change of ownership of tier 1 contractorsEnhanced conflict of interest nutrimentItemsNEC3 Contract and weftUsageRationale1Engineering and Construction Contract selection- C (Target contract with activity schedule)Major and complex venues and bagTarget price was best fit to developing specification2Engineering and Construction Contract Option- A ( Priced contract with activity schedule)Other venuesDesigns were firm allowing cost certainty3Term Service Contrcat Option -A ( Priced contract with activity schedule)Logistics and security contractsPricing schedules accommodated required flexibility in both volume of services required and scale ( through raise services schedules)The New Engineering Contract 2005 version 3 Engineering and Construction Contract recommends that the various methods of specifying the works should be adoptedOption A C Activity ScheduleOption B D Bill of QuantitiesOption E F A traditional Specifications or drawingThe Olympic Delivery Authority used procurement through e-procurement system and methodology, particularly an evaluation system to enable delivery of its insurance objectives and ambitions as followsSustainability and LegacyDesign and AccessibilityE timbre and Inclusion betrothal and SkillsHealth, Safety and SecurityDelivery of London Olympic Stadium in Time, Cost and QualityTender documentations areActivity scheduleMethod statementWorking drawingBOQQuantified SpecificationWork Schedules ( the word Item denotes pricing)Specification + Contract Sum Analysis or Schedule of rank03. Chapter3.1. Construction Technology ChallengesThe London 2012 Olympic Games project was constr ucted with more construction challenges and innovative construction technologies. Some of which are as follows Low-carbon concrete with 40 percent less embodied carbon was used for concreting structures.Surplus atom smasher pipes were used to build the top ring of the Stadium.Recycled containers were used as commode facilities.Demolished existing structures were placed on top of the ground that served as a solid base for the construction.To reduce the loads on the project, 75 percent lightweight steel materials were utilized in the construction.As part of the landscaping works. 500,000 plants were planted in the Olympic Parks wetland areasDue to new technologies that were adopted, only 10,000 tons of steel were used.Tensile roofings were used as to crosscut the ground bowl-like stadium.The project settled at 2,821 feet perimeter land and stands at 197 feet high.The Delivery Partner was comprised of three construction industry leaders, who were responsible for the construction o f all new venues and infrastructure needed for the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. The Olympic Park will house nine state-of-the-art venues including the Olympic stadium, velodrome and water sport center. New Technology was used to fast track the project and attain the completion date of the Project.As the time is the essence, the constructions were done on a 24 hour basis as the design required new methodology to meet the criteria of the Project SpecificationsMethodological challenges that are anticipated includeAchieving adequate coverage of project-level evaluations, within the bounds of practicality, across legacy and sub-legacy themes, geography, demographics, project size/type etcThe complexity of the task and the interdependencies that exist between outcomes and impacts of different projects and programmesThe aggregation and synthesis of different measures and indicators, which may also be of varying qualityAssessing the impact and additionality of interventions in a consistent fashionEnsuring esteem for money and benefits are being measured or estimated using credible evidenceMeasuring intangible impacts using experimental measures such as subjective well-being and through custom techniques such as media marrow analysisMeasuring wider strategic impacts and added value generated through coordination of the organisations involved in planning and delivering legacy3.2. Health and Safety Records/AchievementThe HSE has published the initial in a series of research reports on the London 2012 Olympics as part of a concerted effort to circulate the health and safety lessons learned from the Stratford project among the wider construction industry.There are so many magnificent aspects of London 2012 when it comes to Safety issues and this was achieved through the excellent safety book, curiously during the construction phase.The park was built with zero construction fatalities. It shows the approaches to gain a good occupational Safety and Health . Some of the achievements are as followsThe Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA) honored the Olympic Delivery Authority in a ceremony.More than 12,500 workers helped construct the venues and the Big Build of the site was hailed as the safest construction of an Olympic Stadium.The Executive started working with the Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA) soon after London was awarded the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games and set out gather targets of what standards were expected, encouraging strong leadership and sharing of good practice. Up to this month, the HSE has authentic reports of only 114 injuries and eight dangerous occurrences that occurred during the projects 66 million hours of work.And also the ODAs commitment to health and safety has been recognised by the British Safety Council (BSC) with its 5-star award, following an independent, rigorous audit of the ODAs health and safety management system and processes, in which the ODA received a score of 98 per cen t.The ODA was also awarded the Sword of Honour, one of the most prestigious international health and safety accolades that an organization can receive, which is designed to encourage and reward organizations that work to best practice. All applicants must have already received 5 stars from the BSC04. Chapter4.1. ConclusionBased on the above submission, it can be concluded that the Construction of the facilities needed for the 2012 London Olympic Games were successfully done and completed to the satisfaction of the Client. This achievement was due to the followingThorough evaluation of the Project Requirements as reviewed and evaluated by the Client.An organize procurement strategy within the UK and International market environments.Teamwork and coordination among the stakeholdersUtilizing the familiar form of contract in UKProper implementation of all construction methodology accepted in the construction industry.Proper planning and implementation to meet the required completion d ate.Utilizing new construction technologies and materials.Likewise, a complete record for health and safety were properly organized. A strict implementation of a Safety Plan were followed resulting to no fatalities or major injuries recorded.With respect to the pecuniary aspect of the project, variation orders and cost were not clearly indicated as this will have a big impact on the total and final cost of the project involved.Nevertheless, the over-all aspect of the report can be recommended as it clearly shows that all necessary strategies and construction methodology will have a successful outcome as expected by the client specifically the completion of the project as per the time schedule, work quality and project cost.05. Chapter5.1. BibliographyOlayide Mutiu Adedeji, higher-ranking measuring rod Surveyor, February 20,2013Company CEG International have-to doe with Tel- +974-44551188 autotype +974-44551144E-Mail emailprotectedWeb www.ceg-qatar.com hold P.O. Box -3973, Doha QatarMohamed Azhar, Senior Quantity Surveyor, February 22,2013Company CEG InternationalContact Tel +974-44551188Fax +974-44551144E-Mail emailprotectedWeb www.ceg-qatar.com federal agency P.O. Box -3973, Doha QatarElajun E. Custodio, Civil Engineer, March 20,2013Company CEG InternationalContact Tel- +974-44551188Fax +974-44551144E-Mail emailprotectedWeb www.ceg-qatar.comPost P.O. Box -3973, Doha QatarMahmud Anees Senior Quantity Surveyor, March 15,2013Company KESOContact E-Mail anees yahoo.comWeb www.ceg-qatar.comPost P.O. Box -3973, Doha Qatar